Chidi Anunobi Business Litigation
May 5, 2026
Specific performance in Texas is an equitable remedy that compels a breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations when monetary damages are inadequate. Common in real estate disputes, it requires a valid contract, proof of performance, and fairness, and may be awarded alongside damages in certain cases.
Divorce Matters
May 4, 2026
Change-in-control provisions can significantly impact divorce outcomes in Texas by accelerating the vesting of executive equity compensation during mergers or acquisitions. The timing of a divorce decree relative to such events can determine whether substantial financial gains are treated as community or separate
Business Litigation
May 4, 2026
A force majeure clause in Texas business contracts excuses performance when extraordinary events beyond a party’s control make obligations impossible or impractical. Texas courts strictly enforce these clauses based on their exact wording, requiring specific listed events, timely notice, and true disruption—not just increased cost or inconvenience.
Divorce Matters
May 1, 2026
Dividing equity compensation from multiple employers in a Texas divorce requires separate analysis of each award under Texas Family Code rules. Courts evaluate vesting schedules, tax impacts, and plan restrictions, while pre-IPO equity adds valuation uncertainty. Proper documentation and expert guidance are critical to ensure fair property division.
Business Litigation
May 1, 2026
2026 Comprehensive Blog Calendar-CA 2026 Comprehensive Blog Calendar-CA Convert to PDF Convert and open in Acrobat 100% 11 G123 Buyout rights for dissenting shareholders in Texas provide critical exit options for minority owners in closely held businesses. Through statutory appraisal rights, oppression-based remedies, and contractual buy-sell agreements, shareholders can compel a fair value purchase of their shares when disputes, major transactions, or unfair treatment make continued ownership untenable. Buyout rights for dissenting shareholders in Texas provide critical exit options for minority owners in closely held businesses. Through statutory appraisal rights, oppression-based remedies, and contractual buy-sell agreements, shareholders can compel a fair value purchase of their shares when disputes, major transactions, or unfair treatment make continued ownership untenable. Turn on screen reader support To enable screen reader support, press Ctrl+Alt+Z To learn about keyboard shortcuts, press Ctrl+slash
Business Litigation
April 30, 2026
Oral agreements can be legally binding in Texas if they meet basic contract elements, but certain contracts must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. While enforceable in many cases, verbal agreements are harder to prove, making documentation and supporting evidence critical in disputes.
Medical Negligence
April 30, 2026
Cerebral palsy may result from preventable medical errors during pregnancy, labor, or delivery. In Texas, families may pursue malpractice claims if negligence caused oxygen deprivation or brain injury. Understanding legal deadlines, evidence requirements, and available compensation is critical to protecting your child’s future.
Divorce Matters
April 30, 2026
Clawback provisions can dramatically impact Texas divorce settlements involving executive compensation. If a company later demands repayment of bonuses or equity already divided, the executive often bears the full financial burden. Proper planning, risk allocation, and precise decree language are essential to protect both spouses.
Medical Negligence
April 29, 2026
Clear contract language is critical in Texas business agreements because courts enforce the plain meaning of written terms. Ambiguity can shift disputes from judges to juries, increasing cost and risk. Well-drafted provisions—definitions, integration clauses, and notice terms—help businesses avoid litigation and protect their contractual rights.
Divorce Matters
April 29, 2026
Golden parachutes, phantom stock, and SARs can significantly impact high-net-worth divorces in Texas. Courts often treat these executive compensation benefits as community property, requiring complex valuation and tax analysis. Proper structuring—especially around contingent payouts and IRC tax rules—is essential to ensure equitable division and avoid costly disputes.
